Communities Resolving Our Problems: the basic idea
[SUP: Sharing Problems] [THINK: Guidance] [LEAP: Solving Problems]

Evaluation Thinking Unpacked

Note the importance in the definition given again below of establishing criteria and where necessary explaining them:
 
  This means that before a teacher, judge, principal or citizen passes judgement they must announce or write the criteria that they will use for measurement, that is, for evaluation. Where necessary for the intended audience, these criteria may need explanation to go along with their listing. Only after this has been done, should the evaluator analyze the evidence and compare this evidence against the established criteria. From this analysis the evaluator should reach clearly stated conclusions that follow from their reasoning.

 This means that a response to an evaluation question could have at least five major parts:

  1. Recall or restatement of the issue or debate under discussion
  2. Listing of search terms used in the collection of evidence
  3. Analysis (breakout) of the criteria with explanation of any special criterion that may be more difficult to understand than others
  4. Comparisons and Inferences as to how the evidence of the case matches or does not match these stated criteria.
  5. An evaluation synthesis or summation that indicates why it weights some criteria more heavily than than others and concludes with a judgement as to the recommendation or decision to support or not support the issue or consideration.
Though all four steps are important, steps two and three require significantly more treatment or writing than the other steps. This is the commentary of Dr. Houghton, not part of the official publications of the State Department of Public Instruction.
 
 
Houghton@wcu.edu